Non-Solicitation Clauses Explained
Non-Solicitation Clauses Explained
Non-solicitation clauses are contractual provisions commonly found in employment contracts and commercial agreements. These clauses aim to protect the legitimate business interests of an employer or company by preventing former employees or business partners from soliciting clients, customers, or employees for a specific period after termination of the relationship. In South African law, these clauses are enforceable under certain conditions and must strike a balance between protecting business interests and the constitutional right to freedom of trade, occupation, and profession, as enshrined in Section 22 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.
The Legal Framework
The enforceability of non-solicitation clauses under South African labour law is primarily determined through the lens of reasonableness and public policy. South African courts, particularly the Labour Court and High Court, evaluate these clauses on a case-by-case basis. The leading authority in this regard is Basson v Chilwan and Others 1993 (3) SA 742 (A), where the Appellate Division laid down the test for determining the reasonableness of restraints.
Although Basson primarily dealt with restraint of trade, the same principles apply to non-solicitation clauses. The court examines whether:
- The party has a protectable interest,
- The interest is being prejudiced,
- The interest is worthy of protection,
- The clause is not against public policy,
- The clause is reasonable in terms of time and geographical scope.
Enforceability of Non-Solicitation Clauses in Employment Contracts
The enforceability of non-solicitation clauses hinges on reasonableness. In David Crouch Marketing CC v Du Plessis 2009 (4) SA 569 (SCA), the Supreme Court of Appeal enforced a clause restricting a former employee from soliciting clients for 12 months post-employment. The court emphasized the need to balance the employer’s proprietary interest against the employee’s right to work.
Employers must ensure that their employee non-solicitation agreement template includes:
- A clearly defined scope of prohibited conduct,
- A reasonable duration (commonly 6 to 24 months),
- Specific reference to protected interests (clients, employees, trade secrets),
- Geographical limitations if applicable.
Client Poaching Legal Protections in South African Law
Client poaching involves actively targeting and attempting to win over a business’s existing clients, often by a former employee or business associate. Non-solicitation clauses offer legal protection against such conduct. The case of Experian South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Haynes and Another [2013] ZAGPJHC 290 reinforced that companies have the right to protect their client connections if they can show a legitimate business interest.
The court further clarified that a non-solicitation clause does not need to prevent all forms of competition but must specifically address solicitation of clients or employees to be enforceable.
Difference Between Restraint of Trade and Non-Solicitation Clauses
There is a fundamental distinction between restraint of trade and non-solicitation clauses. A restraint of trade seeks to prevent a former employee from engaging in competing activities, whereas a non-solicitation clause permits competition but prohibits poaching of clients or employees.
This distinction is important as courts are generally more lenient in enforcing non-solicitation clauses. In Automotive Tooling Systems (Pty) Ltd v Wilkens and Others 2007 (2) SA 271 (SCA), the court noted that clauses which merely restrict solicitation rather than trade are viewed as less invasive and more justifiable.
Geographical Scope and Duration: What is Reasonable?
When assessing reasonableness, courts look at the industry context, the role of the employee, and the competitive landscape. A 24-month non-solicitation clause may be enforceable for senior executives but deemed excessive for junior staff.
In Advtech Resourcing (Pty) Ltd t/a Communicate Personnel Group v Kuhn and Another [2008] JOL 22209 (T), the court found a 12-month clause covering the entire Gauteng region reasonable due to the employee’s senior role and access to client databases. Clauses that extend too far in time or geographical reach without justification risk being struck down.
Crafting a Valid Employee Non-Solicitation Agreement Template
Employers should draft clauses tailored to their specific industry and business model. A solid employee non-solicitation agreement template should include:
- Clear definitions of “solicitation” and “client”
- Time limitation (e.g., 12 months post-termination)
- A clause severability provision
- Reference to the legitimate business interests being protected
- Confidentiality and non-disclosure reinforcement
Consultation with legal counsel is highly advisable to ensure alignment with South African labour law non-solicitation standards.
Judicial Trends
South African jurisprudence has evolved towards recognizing and enforcing non-solicitation clauses that protect genuine business interests. However, courts remain vigilant against overly broad or vague restrictions.
In Esquire System Technology (Pty) Ltd t/a Esquire Technologies v Cronjé and Another [2011] ZAGPJHC 121, the court refused to enforce a vague clause that lacked specificity in its scope and beneficiaries. This case underscores the need for clarity and specificity.
Non-Solicitation in the Context of Business Sales and Franchises
Non-solicitation clauses are also prevalent in sale-of-business agreements and franchise contracts. In Rawlins and Another v Caravantruck (Pty) Ltd 1993 (1) SA 537 (A), the court upheld a non-solicitation clause in the sale of a business, noting that the purchaser’s interest in preserving the goodwill was legitimate.
The courts will protect such clauses if they are directly linked to the goodwill purchased and do not impose unreasonable limitations on the seller.
Contractual Drafting Tips: Avoiding Pitfalls in Enforcing Non-Solicitation Clauses
Poorly drafted clauses often fail enforcement. Drafters should:
- Use specific and unambiguous language
- Avoid overly broad restrictions
- Include severability clauses
- Provide for dispute resolution mechanisms
Well-drafted non-solicitation clauses stand a better chance of withstanding judicial scrutiny and offer stronger client poaching legal protections.
The Interplay Between Constitutional Rights and Non-Solicitation Clauses
Section 22 of the Constitution guarantees the right to choose a trade, occupation, or profession freely. Courts weigh this right against the freedom to contract and the need to protect proprietary business interests.
In Reddy v Siemens Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd 2007 (2) SA 486 (SCA), the court emphasized that a clause interfering with the constitutional right to trade must be justified by a legitimate protectable interest and be reasonable.
This principle applies equally to non-solicitation clauses, reinforcing the need for measured and justifiable drafting.
FAQ: Non-Solicitation Clauses Explained
What is a non-solicitation clause? A non-solicitation clause is a contractual provision that restricts a party (typically a former employee or contractor) from soliciting clients, customers, or employees of a business after the termination of their relationship.
Are non-solicitation clauses enforceable in South Africa? Yes, they are enforceable under South African law, provided they are reasonable and not contrary to public policy. Courts assess each case on its facts.
How does a non-solicitation clause differ from a restraint of trade? A non-solicitation clause restricts the targeting of specific relationships (clients or employees), whereas a restraint of trade broadly prevents competitive activity.
Can I include a non-solicitation clause in all employment contracts? Yes, but it should be tailored to the specific role, duration, and geographical scope. Blanket clauses may be deemed unreasonable.
What duration is considered reasonable? Typically, a duration of 6 to 24 months is considered reasonable, depending on the employee’s position and industry.
What if the clause is too broad? Overly broad clauses risk being unenforceable. Courts may strike them down or sever the unreasonable portions.
Is a non-solicitation clause enforceable post-termination without compensation? Yes. Compensation is not always required, but the clause must be reasonable and protect a legitimate interest.
Can a former employee be restrained from contacting clients if there’s no clause? Generally, no. Without a contractual provision, such restraint is difficult to enforce unless trade secrets or confidential information are misused.
Can non-solicitation clauses be used in independent contractor agreements? Yes, provided they meet the test of reasonableness and are tailored to the contractor’s scope of work.
Do I need legal advice to draft these clauses? While not mandatory, legal advice is highly recommended to ensure compliance with South African labour law non-solicitation standards.
References Table
| Case / Statute | Citation | Substance & Importance |
|---|---|---|
| Basson v Chilwan and Others | 1993 (3) SA 742 (A) | Established the reasonableness test for restraint-type clauses, including non-solicitation. |
| David Crouch Marketing CC v Du Plessis | 2009 (4) SA 569 (SCA) | Reinforced enforceability of non-solicitation clauses protecting proprietary interests. |
| Experian South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Haynes | [2013] ZAGPJHC 290 | Affirmed protection of client relationships and enforceability of specific clauses. |
| Automotive Tooling Systems v Wilkens | 2007 (2) SA 271 (SCA) | Differentiated between general restraints and targeted non-solicitation provisions. |
| Advtech Resourcing v Kuhn | [2008] JOL 22209 (T) | Validated time and geographical limitations based on seniority. |
| Esquire Tech v Cronjé | [2011] ZAGPJHC 121 | Highlighted the need for specificity and clarity in clauses. |
| Rawlins v Caravantruck | 1993 (1) SA 537 (A) | Protected purchaser’s goodwill post-sale of business through enforceable clauses. |
| Reddy v Siemens Telecommunications | 2007 (2) SA 486 (SCA) | Addressed the balance between constitutional rights and protectable interests. |
| Constitution of the Republic of South Africa | Section 22 | Guarantees freedom of trade and sets limits on contractual restrictions. |
Useful Links
Information Regulator (South Africa) – Resource for data privacy and compliance with POPIA.
South African Legal Information Institute (SAFLII) – Access to South African legal judgments, useful for finding precedent on NDA enforcement.
International Association of Privacy Professionals – For updates and best practices in privacy law, including international NDA trends.
If you would like to know more about non-compete agreements click here.
For queries regarding the validity of employment contracts click here.
For information about employment rights in the entertainment industry click here.
For information about COIDA claims click here.
For general enforcement of employment rights click here.
For more information about rights in relation to remuneration click here.
For more information about rights during retrenchment click here.
For more information about the fairness of dismissals in absentia click here.
For more information about enforcing restraints of trade click here.
For more information about foreign nationals and working permits click here.
For more information about enforcing a CCMA award click here.
For more information about the right to parental leave click here.
For information about workplace bullying ad harassment click here.
For information about maternity leave click here.
For information about constructive dismissal click here.
For information about unfair labour practices related to training click here,
For queries about legal representation in disciplinary hearings click here.
If your query relates to how UIF is claimed click here.
If your query relates to a matter where the employee in question is a domestic worker click here
If you would like to know more about work for hire agreements click here.
If you would like to know more about interns and their rights click here.
If you would like to know more about the retrenchment process click here.
If you would like to know more about employees rights during probation click here.
If you would like to know more about the registration of non-profit organisations click here.
If you would like to know more about intellectual property law click here.
Meyer and Partners Attorneys have offices in Centurion and can assist with all of your Family Law, Civil Law, Contractual, and labour-related matters.
This article is a general information sheet and should not be used or relied on as legal or other professional advice. No liability can be accepted for errors, omissions, loss, or damage arising from reliance upon any information herein. Don’t hesitate to contact Meyer and Partners Attorneys Incorporated if you require further information or specific and detailed advice. Errors and omissions excepted (E&E).
