Non-Circumvention in Business Deals

by Law Blog MPA | Jul 31, 2025 | Contract, Litigation | 0 comments

Understanding Non-Circumvention in Business Deals

Non-Circumvention in Business Deals and the Purpose of Non-Circumvention Agreements

Non-circumvention in business deals refers to the legal principle that ensures intermediaries, such as agents or brokers, are not bypassed by the parties they introduce to one another. In commercial transactions, particularly those involving joint ventures or international trading, it is common for one party to facilitate an introduction between two other parties. Non-circumvention agreements (NCAs) protect these intermediaries by legally binding the introduced parties not to sidestep them for direct dealings. The purpose of non-circumvention agreements is, therefore, to maintain trust, incentivize introductions, and ensure equitable compensation for intermediaries.

Non-Circumvention Clauses Explained in South African Commercial Contexts

Non-circumvention clauses are typically embedded within broader agreements, such as non-disclosure agreements (NDAs), memoranda of understanding (MOUs), or joint venture agreements. In South African contract law and NCAs, these clauses have evolved to protect business facilitators from exploitative tactics. The clause explicitly outlines the prohibition against one party engaging directly with contacts, clients, or suppliers introduced by the intermediary without the latter’s consent or involvement.

The Role of Non-Circumvention in Business Deals Involving Joint Ventures

In joint ventures, the need for clear boundaries and role definitions makes the use of NCAs particularly vital. Typically, a joint venture may include multiple stakeholders with overlapping interests. To mitigate the risk of one partner capitalizing on introductions made by another, a non-circumvention agreement is used to ensure fairness. These agreements often accompany confidentiality agreements and address not only direct circumvention but also indirect methods, such as dealing through a third party or affiliate.

When to Use a Non-Circumvention Agreement

The strategic use of NCAs is situational. They are particularly relevant:

When an intermediary is introducing parties in a high-stakes deal
When proprietary information or client databases are being shared
In early-stage negotiations for funding, real estate, mergers, and acquisitions
In cross-border transactions where jurisdictional enforcement may be complex

In South Africa, NCAs are especially valuable in industries such as mining, commodities trading, property development, and corporate finance.

South African Contract Law and NCAs: Enforceability and Requirements

In terms of enforceability, non-circumvention agreements in South Africa fall under the common law principles governing contracts. A valid NCA must meet the requirements of:

Consensus: Clear agreement between the parties
Capacity: Parties must have legal capacity
Legality: The contract must not contravene public policy or statutory provisions
Possibility of Performance: The terms must be objectively capable of implementation
Formalities: Where applicable, the agreement must meet formal requirements

Courts have upheld non-circumvention clauses in valid commercial contexts. For example, in South African Forestry Co Ltd v York Timbers Ltd 2005 (3) SA 323 (SCA), the Supreme Court of Appeal affirmed the enforcement of confidentiality and circumvention provisions when contractual terms were clear and mutually acknowledged.

Typical Terms in Non-Circumvention Agreements

Key terms found in NCAs include:

Parties covered: Including affiliates, subsidiaries, and assigns
Scope of introductions: Defining what constitutes an “introduction”
Duration: Often ranging from 1 to 5 years
Governing law: Stipulating jurisdiction, e.g., South African law
Remedies: Detailing legal remedies for circumvention, including damages and injunctive relief

Legal Remedies for Circumvention in South African Law

When circumvention occurs, the aggrieved party may pursue several legal remedies. These include:

Interdicts (injunctions): To restrain further breach
Damages: Including compensatory and consequential losses
Specific performance: Enforcing compliance with contractual obligations
Declaratory orders: Confirming the existence and terms of the NCA

Under Lillicrap, Wassenaar and Partners v Pilkington Brothers (SA) (Pty) Ltd 1985 (1) SA 475 (A), the Appellate Division clarified that contractual remedies are the first recourse in cases of breach, especially where the terms of the agreement are unambiguous.

Non-Circumvention Clauses Explained in the Context of Introductions

Introductions are the lifeblood of many business deals. A clause prohibiting circumvention following an introduction protects the introducing party’s interests. This may involve defining what constitutes an introduction (e.g., verbal mention, meeting facilitation, or written referral). Under South African law, where ambiguity exists, courts favour the interpretation that gives effect to commercial purpose (Coopers & Lybrand v Bryant 1995 (3) SA 761 (A)).

Drafting Tips for Enforceable NCAs Under South African Law

To ensure enforceability, parties should:

Avoid vague terms: Clearly define all obligations
Include dispute resolution mechanisms: Arbitration or litigation venues
Address conflict of laws: Particularly in cross-border settings
Keep written records of all introductions and communications

South African courts emphasise the importance of precision in drafting, as underscored in Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality 2012 (4) SA 593 (SCA), where the court outlined the modern approach to contractual interpretation based on context and commercial rationale.

South African Contract Law and NCAs in Cross-Border Transactions

Non-circumvention agreements are increasingly used in international trade and finance. When dealing with foreign entities, South African intermediaries must ensure that NCAs include:

Clear choice of South African law as governing law
Dispute resolution mechanisms that are enforceable locally
Consideration of treaties such as the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

By aligning NCAs with these frameworks, intermediaries strengthen their ability to seek redress.

When Non-Circumvention in Business Deals Becomes Litigious

Disputes may arise when parties deny the existence of introductions or argue that a contact was already known to them. In such cases, documented evidence of the introduction process and prior communication is crucial. The doctrine of parol evidence rule—outlined in Johnston v Leal 1980 (3) SA 927 (A)—means that written agreements will generally override oral assertions unless fraud or mistake is alleged.

Alternatives and Complements to Non-Circumvention Agreements

While NCAs offer direct protection, they are most effective when used in tandem with other instruments:

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs)
Exclusivity agreements
Heads of Agreement (HoAs)
Service-level agreements (SLAs)

Each adds a layer of legal armour, enhancing enforceability and trust between commercial parties.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About Non-Circumvention in Business Deals

What is the purpose of non-circumvention agreements?
They protect intermediaries from being bypassed after introducing parties to a deal, ensuring fair compensation and preserving business trust.

Are non-circumvention agreements enforceable in South Africa?
Yes, provided they meet general contract law requirements like legality, clarity, and mutual agreement.

When should I use a non-circumvention agreement?
When introducing potential clients, suppliers, or partners where there is a risk of being excluded from future dealings.

What are typical terms in a non-circumvention agreement?
Duration, definition of introduction, remedies, parties bound (including affiliates), and governing law.

Can non-circumvention clauses be part of other agreements?
Yes, they are often embedded in NDAs, MOUs, or service contracts.

What are the legal remedies for circumvention?
Interdicts, damages, specific performance, and declaratory relief.

How can I prove circumvention?
Maintain records of introductions, communications, and agreements. Emails and written confirmations are key.

What happens if there is a dispute about the introduction?
Courts will examine documentary evidence and apply principles of interpretation to determine intent.

Are NCAs useful in international transactions?
Yes, especially when the agreement includes clear jurisdictional clauses and aligns with treaties like the New York Convention.

Can an NCA be indefinite?
While possible, indefinite terms are discouraged as they may be seen as unreasonable or contrary to public policy.

References Table

Legal Authority	Citation	Substance and Importance
South African Forestry Co Ltd v York Timbers Ltd	2005 (3) SA 323 (SCA)	Enforced confidentiality and circumvention clauses where terms were clear
Lillicrap, Wassenaar and Partners v Pilkington Brothers (SA) (Pty) Ltd	1985 (1) SA 475 (A)	Clarified that contractual remedies prevail when contracts are explicit
Coopers & Lybrand v Bryant	1995 (3) SA 761 (A)	Promoted commercial purpose as guiding interpretation principle
Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality	2012 (4) SA 593 (SCA)	Set modern standards for contract interpretation based on context
Johnston v Leal	1980 (3) SA 927 (A)	Reinforced parol evidence rule, privileging written terms over oral ones

Useful Links

Information Regulator (South Africa) – Resource for data privacy and compliance with POPIA.South African Legal Information Institute (SAFLII) – Access to South African legal judgments, useful for finding precedent on NDA enforcement.
International Association of Privacy Professionals – For updates and best practices in privacy law, including international NDA trends.

If you would like to know more about non-compete agreements click here.

For queries regarding the validity of employment contracts click here.

For information about employment rights in the entertainment industry click here.

For information about COIDA claims click here.

For general enforcement of employment rights click here.

For more information about rights in relation to remuneration click here.

For more information about rights during retrenchment click here.

For more information about the fairness of dismissals in absentia click here.

For more information about enforcing restraints of trade click here.

For more information about foreign nationals and working permits click here.

For more information about enforcing a CCMA award click here.

For more information about the right to parental leave click here.

For information about workplace bullying ad harassment click here.

For information about maternity leave click here.

For information about constructive dismissal click here.

For information about unfair labour practices related to training click here,

For queries about legal representation in disciplinary hearings click here.

If your query relates to how UIF is claimed click here.

If your query relates to a matter where the employee in question is a domestic worker click here

If you would like to know more about work for hire agreements click here.

If you would like to know more about interns and their rights click here.

If you would like to know more about the retrenchment process click here.

If you would like to know more about employees rights during probation click here.

If you would like to know more about the registration of non-profit organisations click here.

If you would like to know more about intellectual property law click here.

This article is a general information sheet and should not be used or relied on as legal or other professional advice. No liability can be accepted for errors, omissions, loss, or damage arising from reliance upon any information herein. Don’t hesitate to contact Meyer and Partners Attorneys Incorporated if you require further information or specific and detailed advice. Errors and omissions excepted (E&E).